Loading...

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

News

£135,000 Damages for Hospital’s failure to treat bowel obstruction

Mr H from Dover, Kent was admitted to the William Harvey Hospital, Ashford in August 2017 with severe dehydration and an acute kidney injury. 

As a consequence, he was transferred to the intensive care unit and an x-ray was performed.  The x-ray was not reviewed by either a Radiologist or a member of the treating surgical team. Instead, Mr H was reviewed by a general surgery trainee a day later, by which time he had become seriously ill and his general condition had deteriorated.  The Trainee failed to review any of the imaging or seek advice from a Consultant Surgeon.  

Instead of his symptoms being investigated, Mr H was discharged with arrangements to be made for further bowel investigations as an outpatient.

Four days later, Mr H was re-admitted to the same Hospital. An urgent CT scan was carried out which confirmed a large bowel obstruction. As a result, Mr H had to undergo emergency surgery.  Sadly, Mr H was unable to recover from that surgery and died in September 2017. 

Mr H’s widow instructed Girlings Personal Injury Claims to pursue a clinical negligence claim.  The basis of the claim was that the care delivered to Mr H was substandard. Specifically, there had been a failure on the part of the treating doctors to review the imaging of a critically ill intensive care patient.  Furthermore, the treating general surgery trainee doctor failed to request a patient review from a Consultant Surgeon.

The claim was conducted by Kate Kennell, Partner at Girlings Personal Injury Claims.  Expert evidence was obtained from a Radiologist and a Colorectal expert, who were both supportive of the claim.

The Defendant admitted negligence and initially put forward an offer of £55,000. After negotiations between the parties the claim eventually settled in the sum of £135,000.

Kate Kennell said in relation to the claim:

This was a complex claim whereby many elements of the care which were delivered to Mr H were very poor.  Selecting the best experts in this case was critical to succeeding.  With the assistance of committed and supportive experts and sheer persistence, the claim was brought to a successful conclusion for the client.”